Dec 152012
 

obama marijuana colorado washington growers providersWhat Should Marijuana Growers And Providers Expect From The Obama Administration?

Cannabis law reformers and civil libertarians are anxiously awaiting President Obama’s interview on 20/20 tonight and are already examining his answers as an ABC press release has provided a partial transcript of the interview. From what I have seen and read so far, President’s Obama’s answers on the subject provide us with a mixed bag, his position isn’t all bad, but it isn’t great either.

President Obama makes it clear that recreational users of marijuana are not a priority of the Justice Department, just as he has already said about individual medical marijuana patients. This statement certainly shouldn’t come as a surprise as the federal government has never targetedindividual cannabis consumers and simply doesn’t have the resources to do so. So while cannabis consumers in Washington and Colorado are likely safe from federal prosecution, so are members of the cannabis community across the country, regardless of their state’s marijuana law, so President Obama’s statements regarding recreational users are pretty meaningless.

The big question, that is still unanswered, is whether the Obama Administration will target the producers and providers of cannabis in Colorado and Washington. At one point, Barack Obama, as a presidential candidate, promised that medical marijuana growers wouldn’t be a target under his administration. Unfortunately, President Obama didn’t follow through on his campaign promise and medical marijuana growers and providers have been targeted by the Obama Justice Department.

Washington and Colorado policy makers are working on the implementation of a regulated supply system similar to alcohol A supply system will need to license and regulate commercial cannabis growers as well as retail outlets. Will commercial growers and retail outlets be a priority for prosecution by the Obama Administration? Will the landlords of cannabis growers and retailers be threatened with prosecution, injunctions and forfeiture proceedings? These are the much bigger questions that will determine whether state legalization laws are allowed to operate as intended by the voters. Without a regulated supply system, criminal cartels will still be able to profit as the underground market will remain the only way recreational users will be able to acquire cannabis. Also, states won’t be able to generate the millions of dollars in tax revenue or create thousands of jobs that a licensed and regulated supply system can provide.

On a positive note, President Obama calls for a conversation about how to resolve the conflict between state and federal law and this is on the heels of Senator Patrick Leahy proposing federal legislation to reconcile this issue. Senator Leahy’s initial proposal seems to only tackle individual consumers as well, but hopefully through hearings, the senator and his congressional allies will realize that a licensed and regulated supply system, similar to alcohol, is the best policy for the states and our country. Drug cartels’ profits from the illicit cannabis trade will go away, just as Al Capone and other Prohibition Era gangsters were no longer able to profit from bootlegging liquor once Alcohol Prohibition was repealed. Of course, criminal cartels have other revenue streams, but shouldn’t we do what it takes to shut down one of their profit sources, particularly when our own states can capture that revenue and create much-needed jobs in the process?

As Ethan Nadelmann notes in his excellent piece, there is a remarkable difference in the President’s tone now than when he laughed at the question of marijuana legalization a couple of years ago, so progress is being made. However, it seems that those hoping that President Obama would lead on this issue, will be disappointed. It is clear that it is upon us, cannabis law reformers and civil libertarians, to continue our own progress and expand our political base to incorporate new allies and to organize ourselves better than ever before. We are now winning this war, a war that we didn’t choose, as it is being waged against us, but we have to continue to lead the way and President Obama will have no choice but to follow us.

Republished with special permission from the National Cannabis Coalition

Print Friendly

About Johnny Green

Johnny Green is a marijuana activist from Oregon. He has a Bachelor's Degree in Public Policy. Follow Johnny Green on Facebook and Twitter. Also, feel free to email any concerns.
  • Silverado

    IF BIG agriculture comes in as the official WA state grower we’ll know the coast is clear as far as the feds are concerned, won’t we?? Then it will be balls out with NO SHORTAGES and numerous brands just like the wine & spirits industry dead ahead – there’s money to be made and there’s taxes to be paid!!

    If however it’s left to small mom & pop artisinal growers that are to be the states’ trial balloons (or sacrificial lambs?)….I mean official state growers, then we’ll know that the feds have future anti marijuana plans & sweeps in store and even though the main man said so on national TV, as far as marijuana and the feds are concerned NOTHING will have changed. That is truly a master of the fork-ed tongue. Sorry if I’m having a little trouble believing him….

    • http://www.facebook.com/bob.w.knight Bob William Knight

      how bout having 10,000 official growers each with 99 plants this? makes it expensive to shut down

      • WAGrower

        No way. You’re dreaming (or is it consuming too much of your own product?) if you think the state has 10,000 growers as you suggest. What kind of control would that be or provide??? None. Did you happen to notice that there’s no provisions for growing unless you’re a MMJ patient?? Do you think that’s some kind of accident?? No….the state wants to deal with ONE GROWER growing in ONE LOCATION – not 10,000. That would be the state’s ULTIMATE POT NIGHTMARE and it ain’t gonna happen, Bubba. And let’s face it, BIG ag knows how to grow things. Cows, corn, tobacco, you name it and I’m almost sure they could figure out how to grow pot and on a GRAND SCALE should that be required. After all now that it’s legal and BIG ag will be providing the product to be taxed there will be NO shortages and the actual price per ounce will be well below what it is now. And how do I know this??? If it doesn’t go like I’m….imagining here, their plan simply won’t work. They MUST price their product cheap enough to under cut the black market. And right now the “black market” in marijuana in Washington state, especially on the west side of the mountains, says ounces of top shelf bud are worth and have stabilized a bit at $150 per ounce as long as you buy in quantity. I don’t care what http://www.priceofweed.com says it goes for here. The only way they can fuck this up is to act like the dispensary’s and charge an arm and a leg letting the black market not only exist but I’d predict that IT WILL FLOURISH if they don’t price like I say they should. They can only tax the pot they produce and can sell. And if their pricing model is….incorrect – well you get the picture. And so will they….

        • http://www.facebook.com/bob.w.knight Bob William Knight

          wrong you talk too much and know so little. lol maybe cut back on the meth .we dont need your negative input. 10,000 growers it is .you are the enemy !

  • concerned in uk
  • bb54

    Half the pleasure is smoking it,Half the pleasure is growing it.
    Small is beautiful (again)

  • conrad shawles

    It really bizarre to think of the efforts being made to regulate the amount of cannabis available especially considering that no one has ever suffered/ died from an overdose of cannabis. Whereas large amounts of alcohol can have a lethal impact even on a fully grown man!