led grow light
Growing Marijuana

LED Grow Light Chip Size

Iled grow lightn a quest to find the best LED Grow lights, we have taken on the great debate about which lights come out on top. Many times, the question has been raised whether one watt, three watt, or five watt diodes are the superior choice for growing. Our research team has put in the legwork and come up with results that will put an end to the confusion.

To tackle the question at hand and get you the answers you need for better growing, we decided to take a look back at history. There’s no doubt that LED grow lights have come a long way since the thirteen watt panels consisting of 225 mini diodes. Those fifteen row column panels were unsuccessful to say the least, since they were not able to grow much of anything except simple grasses and sprouts. Even then, the performance would certainly not call for an encore. LED grow lights took the heat for these initial substandard panels by getting a bad name for years until stronger diodes became readily available. Surprisingly, 225 mini diode models are still being sold today but are clearly ranked subpar compared to its stronger successors.

The birth of one and two watt diodes in LED grow lights definitely changed the game. The larger wattage diodes were able to penetrate a plant’s canopy three to four feet. Although this amount of penetration sufficed for most growers, commercial growers still needed an extra hand. The commercial growing segment of the indoor growing market needed a plant grow light that could reach down an extra foot or two to the bottom of the plants.

Following their one-watt predecessor, three watt diodes made their entrance in 2009. Coming in with a bang, the three-watt diode provided the ideal balance of canopy penetration without being plagued with heat issues that come with larger diodes. With three-watt diodes, a grow light was able to penetrate up to five feet past the plant’s canopy and was the perfect design being demanded by the indoor growing market.

After the grand entrance of the three-watt diodes, clever marketers started manufacturing indoor grow lights with five watt, ten watt, and even larger diodes. Although presumably stronger, larger diodes fall short when compared to the success of their three-watt counterparts. On the surface this seems to be natural progression for grow light strength, but the LED grow lights with the larger diodes have some very critical drawbacks.

 

  1. Let’s talk about heat dissipation and density. As the diode size increases, so does the amount of heat that needs to be dissipated by the diode chip. Larger wattage diodes need larger heat sinks to dissipate the heat that they give off, resulting in heavier and bulkier lights.
  2. Speaking of chips, it may be mistakenly perceived that five-watt chips are more stable than three-watt chips, but this is certainly not the case. Five Watt chips have stability issues and a higher rate of failure.

 

  1. If you thought that larger diodes could be packed as densely as the three watt designed lights, guess again. Another critical design drawback of larger diodes is that they cannot be packed as densely as the three-watt design. When using five-watt or ten-watt diodes, you must space the diodes further apart because of the problem of heat dissipation, which results in a less densely packed grow light with strong spots and weak spots of light projection.
  2. The price of these larger diodes brings us to the final reason why three-watt diodes are unquestionably the better choice for indoor growing. Not only do the 5+ watt diodes cost more overall, but they are also more expensive on a price per watt and price per growing-area-covered basis. The added penetration is superfluous and unnecessary for indoor growers and it comes at a burdensome cost- increased price and less densely packed network of diodes.

 

When it comes to the great debate between three-watt and five-watt diodes for LED grow lights, the three-watt diode comes out on top by a landslide. The three-watt diode is without a doubt the smarter choice for any indoor growing project. Make sure to go with a high quality brand when deciding which LED grow lights to invest in for you indoor growing hobby or business. Do your research and go with a high performance light that will give you the yield you are looking for.

Reference: Ehud Muhlev, PhD. EE

  • Master of Reality

    Lets get 1 thing clear, LED in any wattage are not equal to MH and HPS lights for yield. Plus they are way over priced. Maybe one day they will catch up. Until then anyone that claims they are equal to MH and HPS is selling you fairy dust and unicorn farts! End of story! Do we have to keep pretending like LED is superior?$?$?$

    • Mr. Green Sticky Jeans

      Agreed, I work for a huge collective, we bought every brand on the market as of this year, saved some on the power bill. But the yields ARE NOT THERE!!!!!!! We can afford anything we want, we have sold most of the LED lights we bought, we did keep some for clones.

  • Nobodys Fool

    Muhlev, PhD. EE Is bogus and only found on dormgrow.com. Seems like someone with PhD is their title would have some proof of there credentials on the world wide web. I call bull #%$@# on this bogus person and these bogus claims

  • Silverado

    Price per watt and better yields (I routinely harvest 1+ pounds per 1k light) mean that your regular 1k HPS & MH grow lights are still superior to any LED light. Maybe for some supplemental lighting IF you can afford it. But for main lighting (with a desirable footprint) that I CAN COUNT ON all the way to the end, it’s HID all the way for me, baby!! If it ain’t broke (and HID lighting isn’t…yet) leave it alone. There STILL isn’t anything better…

    • Master of Reality

      Right on brother! Don’t piss in our face and tell us its rain!

    • Doc Deadhead

      Agreed Silver, I get closer to 2 lbs. per 1K. Totally impossible for LED under 900-1000w so where is the advantage? I air cool the HPS so heat is lower than non-air cooled LED, advantage HPS all the way.

  • Weed Blog Fetish Girl

    Shame on the weed blog for this yellow journalism, I know you guys mean well, And we love you for everything you do, but come on Johnny, Ehud Muhlev, PhD. EE does not even exist! I still LOVE you guys :)

  • I am surprised more companies have not turned to smaller chips… Our company mission is to compete with HID at a commercial level and the smaller chips and more of them is one of our biggest breakthroughs regarding intensity and stability. Our custom phosphor LED panels just became available and they are rated #1 at the department of energy, which includes 30,000 companies. Smaller is better

    • Master of Reality

      Troll on, More fairy dust and unicorn farts

    • Master of Reality

      Your real company mission is to lie to people and waste their money. Are those 30,000 big whup companies growing cannabis?

      Dr. Lieshisassoff Ph. Dumbass

  • Hate all you want.. technology is advancing

    • Won’t get fooled again

      Lie all you want, no one is listening! Nobody is hating here professional victim, just telling the truth unlike you.

  • This topic was on smaller chip sizes… we use mA millia amp chips in our panels unlike other LED companies who think bigger is better.. we don’t have heat issues and our panels pump out more intensity by using mA chips hence the #1 ranking.. food for thought is all not trying to sell fairy dust haha just discussing chip size

  • Brada Haole

    All I know is this one works and works well! XML 350 with a 10 watt chip. http://www.advancedledlights.com/3w-led-grow-lights/new-diamond-series-xml-10w-cree-xml/ mine runs cool to the touch just like they say.