Nov 202014
 November 20, 2014

new approach oregon marijuana legalizationOn election night I sent out tweets predicting that after Oregon legalized marijuana, that we would see parts of Oregon suspend marijuana enforcement. I’m happy to say that my prediction has come true, as Multnomah County and Clackamas County have both said that they will treat future marijuana cases as if Measure 91 was in effect. Multnomah County didn’t surprise me nearly as much as Clackamas County, which has traditionally been an unfriendly marijuana county.

The same week that Oregon legalized marijuana, I posted an article urging all counties to suspend marijuana enforcement, because after all, it’s a waste of time arresting and citing people for something that is going to be legal soon. It’s a waste of time even if it’s not going to be legal soon, but especially wasteful given the resounding victory on Election Day in Oregon. The Oregon Measure 91 campaign today released an open letter calling for Oregon District Attorneys to implement Oregon Measure 91 as soon as possible. That letter is below:

Although Oregon voters passed Measure 91 with a 12-point margin, implementation of this better, smarter approach to marijuana policy will not be complete until the first half of 2016. We don’t have to wait until then to start to mitigate the damage done by decades of criminalization, wasted law enforcement time and squandered taxpayer money.

Prosecutors in Oregon’s largest county have already decided to dismiss, and stop prosecuting, marijuana-related offenses that would no longer exist under Measure 91. Other county prosecutors should follow Multnomah County’s lead.

A strong majority of Oregon voters have directed the state to stop treating marijuana as a crime and to better prioritize our limited law enforcement resources. With so many lives and so much money at stake, waiting would be unreasonable and clearly damaging to Oregon’s communities. We should work quickly to limit the damage already caused by a feckless war against marijuana.

We urge you to cease enforcement of marijuana laws that will no longer exist when provisions of Measure 91 take effect in July.

Respectfully,
Anthony Johnson, Director, New Approach Oregon, Chief Petitioner of Measure 91

David Fidanque, Executive Director, ACLU of Oregon

Becky Straus, Legislative Director, ACLU of Oregon

Kris Olson, former US Attorney for the District of Oregon

Darian Stanford, former Drug Unit Prosecutor

Paul Steigleder, former Lieutenant Sheriff

Pete Tutmark, former Deputy Sheriff

Inge Fryklund, former Assistant State’s Attorney

Ari Wubbold, Vice-Chair of the City Club of Portland Research Committee on Measure 91

Comments

comments

About Johnny Green

Dissenting opinions are welcome, insults and personal attacks are discouraged and hate speech will not be tolerated. Spammers and people trying to buy or sell cannabis or any drugs will be banned. Read our comment policy and FAQ for more information

  6 Responses to “Open Letter To Oregon District Attorneys – Stop Prosecuting For Marijuana”

  1.  

    I know most presidential candidates campaign in Iowa first, but I’m thinking that for 2016, I should start in Oregon.
    (Nice graphic.)

  2.  

    It would be a good faith gesture for the DA to stop their crazy prosecution of what will soon be innocent citizens, hello common sense, hello common sense are you there, do you hear the people, hello?

  3.  

    So my question is will we be able to get action on the idea that those in prison in Oregon for purely Cannabis-related convictions should be released? I say its worth a shot.

    •  

      Let’s hope the process is started for some and others will follow …. We can only hope brother and I’m sure it has!

    •  

      It costs taxpayers over $100,000 per year to house a marijuana inmate. That’s if he/she does not require anything additional such as medical help and drugs. It is killing our economy locking up marijuana “offenders”. Let them all out now.

  4.  

    I’m rather surprised the attorney for Oregon’s largest city has not become more involved in helping those currently caught up in the state criminal justice system. Member’s of the city council should become involved too. ( if I’m mistaken and they have already done so, please feel free to correct me).

 Leave a Reply