Dec 082012
 December 8, 2012

sonoma county california medical marijuana board of supervisorsA New Petition Has Been Started To Help Protect Medical Marijuana In Sonoma County California

By Sonoma Alliance for Medical Marijuana

On December 6th, 2012, it was made public that the Board of Supervisors would be adding an item to their December 11th meeting agenda that would dramatically change the legal landscape of local medical cannabis patients’ rights.

The Medicinal Marijuana Ad Hoc Committee recommends that the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors (1) repeal their 2006 resolution allowing for local qualified patients to cultivate up to 30 plants, which would effectively reduce the allowable number to the state mandatory minimum of 6 plants, (2) to establish an ordinance prohibiting the cultivation of marijuana in unoccupied residential buildings and (3) direct staff to establish a Marijuana Task Force modeled on the Sonoma County Methamphetamine Task Force.

These recommendations have not been vetted by community members or industry stakeholders and five days is not enough time for the Board of Directors to elicit input from their constituents on this controversial public program. There is no scientific basis for these changes and the recommendations disregard the fact that current regulations were based on substantial research data provided by local law enforcement and government staff and have been shown to be successful in our community for over six years. In contrast, the Medicinal Marijuana Ad Hoc Committee, chaired by supervisors Shirley Zane and Valerie Brown (known cannabis opponents), made this recommendation based on limited staff reports, engaging NO community members and without following ANY public process.

If these recommendations are adopted, there would be severe consequences for Sonoma County patients and the community at large, creating more criminals, costing more money in the arrest, prosecution and incarceration of qualified medical cannabis patients, and placing the burden on seriously ill persons to prove their own innocence in a court of law. This type of action would also set precedence for similar actions in other California jurisdictions, including Mendocino, Trinity, Napa, Humboldt and beyond.

Citizens of Sonoma County pride themselves on being part of a progressive, thoughtful and compassionate community. In a legal landscape where other jurisdictions are passing resolutions placing cannabis at lowest priority for law enforcement and two states have passed legalization by voter initiatives, this is clearly a step in the wrong direction.

Please show your support by signing this petition and attending the Sonoma County Board of Supervisor meeting this Tuesday December 11th at 2:30 PM located at 575 Administration Drive, Santa Rosa, CA 95403. You can also call the Supervisors at (707)565-2241 or reach out to them at their individual emails which are posted on the following page:

It is imperative that we take action now to protect patients’ rights, safe access and responsible public process in Sonoma County!


Petition Language:

Sonoma County Board of Supervisors
Shirlee Zane, District 3 Supervisor
Valerie Brown, District 1 Supervisor
Efren Carillo, District 5 Supervisor
David Rabbit, District 2 Supervisor
Mike McGuire, District 4 Supervisor
Jill Ravitch, Sonoma County District Attorney
Steve Freitas, Sonoma County Sheriff

Take no action on the recommendations of the Marijuana Ad Hoc Committee

[Your name]


About Johnny Green

Johnny Green is a marijuana activist from Oregon. He has a Bachelor's Degree in Public Policy. Follow Johnny Green on Facebook and Twitter. Also, feel free to email any concerns.
Dissenting opinions are welcome, insults and personal attacks are discouraged and hate speech will not be tolerated. Spammers and people trying to buy or sell cannabis or any drugs will be banned. Read our comment policy and FAQ for more information
  • Duncan20903

    California does not have a limit on the number of plants a medicinal cannabis patient is allowed to grow except that the plant count has to be justified as medically necessary.

    For quite a number of years they had a “limit” of 6 mature or 12 immature plants but that was only for protection from arrest. The number was more accurately a floor, not a ceiling. Regardless, the California Supreme Court struck down that section of the Medicinal Marijuana Program Act finding that it modified the Compassionate Use Act (CUA) in Kelly v State of California (2010). The California legislature can’t modify a citizen generated ballot initiative unless the resulting law specifically gives them permission to do so. The CUA gave no such authorization. The legislature can’t even put a legislature sponsored initiative on the ballot to change the resulting law.

  • city boy

    reefer madness….. free da weed