- The Weed Blog https://www.theweedblog.com

A Harvard Professor Crunches the Numbers of Pot Prohibition

5
Share.

Harvard Professor Breaks Down Marijuana Prohibition Data

By Paul Rogers

Most of us are already aware that America’s marijuana prohibition is expensive to enforce–but we would struggle to quantify this. It’s clear that all those pot busts incur vast police, judicial and correctional costs, and that prohibition also blocks a potential cannabis tax bonanza, but just what are the financial realities? Dr. Jeffrey A. Miron, Visiting Professor of Economics at Harvard University, aimed to find out with his 2005 paper The Budgetary Implications of Marijuana Prohibition (commissioned by the Marijuana Policy Project) and forthcoming Cato Institute report The Budgetary Implications of Legalizing Drugs (co-authored with NYU’s Katherine Waldock).

Miron’s findings include state-by-state breakdowns of marijuana prohibition arrests and related costs; federal expenditure on prohibition; and potential marijuana tax revenues. His more recent report indicates that legalizing pot would save $8.7 billion per year in government expenditure (state and federal) and yield tax revenue of $8.7 billion annually (assuming marijuana was taxed at rates comparable to those of alcohol and tobacco).

In short, America could be over $17 billion better off each year if the herb was legal.

And these are just the fiscal downsides of prohibition, according to Miron, an outspoken libertarian who regularly appears on TV news and discussion shows. “[There’s] a whole set of ancillary costs from prohibition that include corruption, violence (because disputes in underground markets get resolved with violence) and a sort of changing attitude towards medicinal use because federal authorities are very concerned that medicinal use might lead to casual use . . . So people who use marijuana for medicinal purposes do not have the same access and we don’t have the same quality of research that we’d have if marijuana was legal.”

Miron’s reports point out that the budgetary implications of legalization exceed those of decriminalization, because legalization eliminates arrests for trafficking (which result in the bulk of prosecutorial/judicial/incarceration expenses) rather than just those for possession, and further it allows for the taxation of pot production and sale. So he welcomes California-style marijuana medicalization (which many view as de facto decriminalization), but only as a step on the road to full legalization.

“[Medicalizing] certainly allows some of the market to come above ground; it allows some of the people who want to use marijuana to do so with reduced or little fear of being arrested . . . but it’s a somewhat murky thing; it’s kind of a partial message.

In effect, there’s a tacit truce between governments that decriminalize pot and the many different opinions amongst the voters they aim to appease. “From a political perspective . . . decrim[inalization]as practiced in places like the Netherlands and Portugal might be the sensible compromise, because it allows people to believe it’s still illegal, even though in practice it’s pretty close to being legal,” says Miron.

“I think what happens when places decriminalize, de facto, they actually also move in the direction of fully legalizing. They don’t impose the penalties for production and distribution with the same vigor; they kind of engage in some benign neglect –and so decrim is kind of a kinder, gentler word for de facto legalization. If you say ‘legalization’ a lot of people get really upset.”

Miron acknowledges that revenue from pot prohibition fines and seizures would disappear with legalization (though he estimates this to be in the hundreds of millions of dollars and, therefore, far from offsetting the costs), but he dismisses the idea that lifting prohibition could result in Americans becoming less productive and thus negatively impacting the economy.

“If those views were accurate, we would have seen that sort of thing happen in the Netherlands, we’d have seen it in Portugal. We basically would have seen it happen in California, where certainly almost anyone who has any desire to sit around and smoke pot all day can usually get access to it . . . I just don’t think there’s any evidence to support that and also common sense doesn’t support that. If the species was that easily deviated from being productive, human beings would have died out long ago, because the stuff has been available for millennia!”

this article courtesy of CULTURE Magazine

Share.

About Author

We’re everything you need to know about marijuana – your #1 source of important marijuana-related information. From the plant and its benefits to its place in culture and society, TWB has you covered! News. Culture. Science. Cooking. Growing. Industry. Advocacy. You can find this and so much more.

5 Comments

  1. From a philosphical puritan standpoint I agree with you Chat but we need to make strides where we can. Once legalization is put into effect the rest can follow and be debated.

  2. I think we all can agree that we hate taxes and I’m not going to try to justify taxes. Taxing cannabis seems unavoidable, however, I do believe there should be a distinction between medical and recreational.

  3. Paul von Hartmann on

    TAXING POT PATIENTS TO RAISE MONEY FOR THE BUREAUCRACY IS MADNESS. IF THE POLICE WOULD JUST STOP BUSTING PEOPLE, WE WOULD SAVE A HELL OF A LOT MORE MONEY THAN WOULD BE RAISED BY TAXES.

  4. Well fist of all **Cents is the word i think you were looking for. and secondly, the only way we will be able to get people who are anti marijuana to let the rest of us legalize it, we will have to show them how it will benefit them, with out their use. And with a tax we could really turn our economy around, and i happen to know that as soon as more people are willing to accept that the sooner it will be legal.at that point its up to us to make sure the tax is fair and just or we might have another revolution on our hands… and trust me ill be up there on the front lines to help out in anyway i can

  5. I am sorry if I differ from anyone but to gain acceptance through taxation. In my opinion a major sellout.
    This wonderful Medicine is given to us by God.
    The only taxes that should be occured is The companys profit, just like any business. The workers income tax and the regular sales tax.

    I feel that the special tax will be turned into a Moral Tax, that could climb exsorbantly.

    Just my two Ceants

Leave A Reply