- The Weed Blog https://www.theweedblog.com

Congress’ Continued Disconnect On Marijuana Prohibition

8
Share.

Federal marijuana policyBy Allen St. Pierre, NORML Executive Director

Among the many hundreds of public policy concerns that Americans care and act upon, what are the top policy concerns in Congress for which citizens search?

-Military spending?
-Environment?
-Reproduction Rights?
-Economy?
-National Deficit?
-Sequestration?
-Drones Used In Domestic Law Enforcement?

None of these supposedly political hot button topics were at the top of a newly created list by Thomas (the online interface the public has with Congressional legislation, run by the Library of Congress).

According to the March 6 print edition of The Hill, the new marijuana legalization legislation introduced by Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) was the second most popular legislation that citizens have searched on in the previous week (second only to the white hot issue of pending gun control legislation).

Gun, pot bills attract the most attention online
By Bob Cusack

It’s a Top 10 list that will never make David Letterman’s show, but it reveals that people are very interested in guns and marijuana. A relatively new feature on the Library of Congress THOMAS site is a Top 10 list of bills searched on Congress’s official website.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s (D-Calif.) measure to ban assault weapons has the top spot with Rep. Earl Blumenauer’s (D-Ore.) bill to allow states to legalize medical marijuana in second place.

However, despite the popularity for marijuana law reform in America, will the leaders in the House allow even a subcommittee hearing on the Blumenauer bill (or the near half dozen other marijuana law reform bills—which range from legalization to banking regulation reform to decriminalization to sentencing reform to industrial hemp)?

Aren’t elected officials supposed to listen, deliberate and respond to public advocacy—long festering public advocacy, in the case for cannabis law reform going back almost forty-five years—rather than be silent and oppositional?

Who do they work for? Who pays their salaries? Who is ‘wise’ enough to both elect them to power and also want substantive cannabis law reforms? Why disrespect citizens’ concerns in a democracy?

The phenomena of ‘malevolent neglect’ specific to cannabis law reform is not of course unique to the legislative branch as President Obama has laughed off basically the number one asked question at his so-called electronic town meetings from the beginning of his presidency.

The empirical data (all measurable from public surveys to citizen vote totals to public interest with reform legislation to Internet traffic on reform vs. prohibitionist webpages) is clear and elected officials—from all political parties—are rue to ignore it: Ending cannabis prohibition is a major political concern for Americans.

Source: NORML

Share.

About Author

8 Comments

  1. Cannabis activism has come of age. Wether we realize it or not we have become a political force. It is time to unite under one movement and create a political party to challenge our current political constipation in congress. It does not have to be named anything associated with cannabis, but it should represent a sensible progressive position that protects and preserves liberty of the people, states rights, and personal freedoms.

    If we can come together to reform cannabis we can do the same for a lot of other issues and do so at the same time. We have the opportunity to make changes that are important to ensure that we remove ultra-conservative legislation, while allowing the ultraconservative paradigm to die along with the generation that started it.

    I’m tired of commenting and would rather get my hands dirty and start making things happen in D.C.

  2. Those who will not listen or respond to a clear mandate from the electorate should be named and I would say shamed but they obviously have none ! If they can be exposed then maybe they can be voted out of office and replaced with someone more resonable !!

  3. Mark Edwards on

    Its a shame that our government is no longer by the people for the people, but for the few elect that belong to a good ole boy network who feel that the American public doesn’t know what’s right and what is wrong. What a shame that the American public is more informed than our elected officials.