- The Weed Blog https://www.theweedblog.com
Share.

Medical Marijuana Patients Get Their Day In Federal Court With The Obama Administration

7

dc circuit court medical cannabisD.C. Circuit To Hear Oral Arguments This October In Lawsuit Challenging Marijuana’s Federal Classification

Late last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit agreed to hear oral arguments in Americans for Safe Access v. Drug Enforcement Administration, a lawsuit challenging the federal government’s classification of marijuana as a dangerous drug with no medical value. Ten years after the Coalition for Rescheduling Cannabis (CRC) filed its petition, the courts will finally review the scientific evidence regarding the therapeutic value of marijuana. The D.C. Circuit is scheduled to hear oral arguments on October 16th at 9:30am.

“Medical marijuana patients are finally getting their day in court,” said Joe Elford, Chief Counsel with Americans for Safe Access, the country’s leading medical marijuana advocacy group. “This is a rare opportunity for patients to confront politically motivated decision-making with scientific evidence of marijuana’s medical efficacy,” continued Elford. “What’s at stake in this case is nothing less than our country’s scientific integrity and the imminent needs of millions of patients.”

ASA filed its lawsuit in January, challenging the July 2011 Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) denial of the CRC petition, which was filed in 2002. The DEA is the final arbiter on petitions to reclassify controlled substances, but other agencies are also involved in the review process. Patient advocates claim that marijuana is treated unlike any other controlled substance in that rescheduling petitions are encumbered by politics and therapeutic research is subjected to a unique and overly rigorous approval process.

The announcement of oral arguments comes just weeks after a study was published in The Open Neurology Journal by Dr. Igor Grant one of the leading U.S. medical marijuana researchers, claiming that marijuana’s Schedule I classification is “not tenable.” Dr. Grant and his fellow researchers concluded it was “not accurate that cannabis has no medical value, or that information on safety is lacking.” The study urged additional research, and stated that marijuana’s federal classification and its political controversy are “obstacles to medical progress in this area.” Marijuana’s classification as a Schedule I substance (along with heroin and methamphetamine) is based on the federal government’s position that it has “no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States.”

For more than a year, the Obama Justice Department has been escalating its attacks in medical marijuana states, including dozens of new federal indictments and prosecutions. Though U.S. Attorneys often claim that the accused have violated state law in some way, defendants are prevented from using any medical evidence or a state law defense in federal court. If the rescheduling lawsuit is successful and marijuana is reclassified, federal defendants will then gain the basis for a medical necessity defense.

The ASA appeal brief asserts that the federal government has acted arbitrarily and capriciously in its efforts to deny marijuana to millions of patients throughout the U.S. ASA argues in its brief that the DEA has no “license to apply different criteria to marijuana than to other drugs, ignore critical scientific data, misrepresent social science research, or rely upon unsubstantiated assumptions, as the DEA has done in this case.” ASA is urging the court to “require the DEA to analyze the scientific data evenhandedly,” and order “a hearing and findings based on the scientific record.” The panel of judges assigned to hear oral arguments includes Circuit Judges Henderson and Garland, and Senior Circuit Judge Edwards.

Seventeen states and the District of Columbia have adopted medical marijuana laws that not only recognize the medical efficacy of marijuana, but also provide safe and legal access to it.Since the CRC petition was filed in 2002, an even greater number of studies have been published that show the medical benefits of marijuana for illnesses such as neuropathic pain, multiple sclerosis, and Alzheimer’s. Last year, the National Cancer Institute, a division of the federal Department of Health and Human Services, added cannabis to its list of Complementary Alternative Medicines, pointing out that it’s been therapeutically used for millennia.

AFI: Several patient-plaintiffs are available for interviews

William Britt
Mr. Britt is a 52-year-old resident of Long Beach, California, who developed polio as a child, which caused him to have scoliosis, a fused left ankle, shortened left leg, and bone degeneration in his left hip. Mr. Britt also suffers from epilepsy, depression and insomnia, and uses marijuana to treat chronic pain in his leg, back, and hip. Marijuana has reduced Mr. Britt’s seizures and depression, and helps him sleep. Although Mr. Britt has taken prescription medication such as Marinol, Robaxin, Soma, and Xanax, none has proven as effective as marijuana.

Michael Krawitz
Mr. Krawitz is a 49-year-old resident of Elliston, Virginia, who suffered an automobile accident in 1984 while serving in the United States Air Force. Mr. Krawitz has been rated by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) as being totally and permanently disabled. Mr. Krawitz uses marijuana to treat chronic pain and trauma associated with his accident. He also use marijuana to treat central serous retinopathy. However, because of Mr. Krawitz’s medical marijuana use, he has been denied pain treatment by the VA.

Steph Sherer
Ms. Sherer is a resident of Washington, D.C. and the founder and Executive Director of Americans for Safe Access (ASA). In April of 2000, Ms. Sherer suffered a physical attack that has caused her to suffer from a condition that produced inflammation, muscle spasms, pain throughout her body, and decreased mobility in her neck. Because of multiple pain medications she was prescribed, Ms. Sherer suffered kidney damage. After her doctor recommended medical marijuana, Ms. Sherer successfully reduced her inflammation, muscle spasms, and pain. This prompted Ms. Sherer to found ASA in April of 2002 to share what she learned about the therapeutic value of marijuana and to change public policy.

Further information:
D.C. Circuit announcement of oral arguments: http://AmericansForSafeAccess.org/ASA_v_DEA_Oral_Arguments.pdf
ASA appeal brief: http://AmericansForSafeAccess.org/downloads/CRC_Appeal.pdf
DEA denial of CRC petition: http://AmericansForSafeAccess.org/downloads/CRC_Petition_DEA_Answer.pdf
CRC rescheduling petition: http://www.drugscience.org/PDF/Petition_Final_2002.pdf

Share.

About Author

7 Comments

  1. Cathleen Lemire on

    If anybody doubts whether cannibis helps those who have serious neuromuscular diseases,they need to have a member of their family or a friend with that disease and witness how much it changes their life to be almost normal.

  2. This has already been tried with no success. A federal judge ruled on a petition to reschedule marijuana way back in 1988. He said it should be rescheduled. And it’s still a Schedule 1 substance today. So what makes anybody think the DEA will abide by a ruling this time when they’ve ignored the ruling of a federal judge before? The DEA is not bound by the decisions of any judge. The judicial branch has no way to enforce their decisions against the executive branch. This is essentially a symbolic lawsuit that will at best result in a non-binding decision.

  3. ASA has taken on the man! bout time. enough people are negatively effected by archaic cannabis prohibitions ,go getum ASA !

  4. liberty bell temple on Hollywood blvd is Rastafarian.

    by keeping cannabis users split recreational/medical, the strength is weakened . In unity we gain strength in numbers
    cannabis has been hi-jacked by ” medical marijuana industry”
    they feel all other use than medical must be criminal.
    politics!

  5. Considering US Patent 6630507 Cannabinoids as Antioxidants and Neuroprotectants: filed by the Department of Health was issued on October 7, 2003 and is estimated Expiration Date: February 2, 2021; the United States Government knows the benefits of cannabis. The politicians just want the profits from the “drug war” and the regulations. The has been proof decades but the same politicians have been in office and nothing has changed? If the same politicians stay in office, do you truly expect a change?

    I do not.

  6. sisterlauren on

    Please defend our religious freedom when it comes to choosing medicine.

    Also, please support Reverend Roger Christie. Here is his facebook page, Liberate Roger Christie and the THC Ministry – 14 Facing Federal Charges
    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Liberate-Roger-Christie-and-the-THC-Ministry-14-Facing-Federal-Charges/114430088654828

    A lot of the people facing medical discrimination over marijuana are also facing it in many other aspects of their lives. Religious discrimination is like that. We need to learn to be better about recognizing the source of that discrimination and defending each other against it. Medical is not enough.

    I looked to see if I could find a THC Ministry on line since the one in Hawaii is too short of money to support their website, and found there is a dispensary in So Cal that is associated with a church. I was really pleased to see that. I’d like to visit it. I hope posting about it does not bring the feds down on them.

    If it does, I hope ASA would step out of it’s mission statement and also defend our religious use. We do not have the support from lawyers on that issue that we need or deserve. I’m curious about why that is.

  7. eating_sunshine on

    The feds, after all these years, and a trillion dollars, is going to admit they are wrong? If that actually happens, the entertainment value will be off the hook funny.
    Cut to the youtube video of the chief DEA administrator looking retarded about simple marijuana questions.

Leave A Reply